Jump to content

Garrus

Staff Council
  • Posts

    615
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by Garrus

  1. Imagine buying a faction whose purpose is to be a simp for a larger one... And @Torr you forgot to mention how DR is NCR's DR...
  2. Shit cuh they did the colonel dirty
  3. To be fair kekulies, you are one of 3 factions who have access to stealth abilities early on. And not only that, but of the 3 that have early access to stealth, the other two are restrained by price/stock/stock rate/mid DR of an armor set, while Nightkin is but a whitelist, so overall better stats (because they can THEN equip an armor set on top of their better-than-human HP), you can field more, and you can field it for free. That creates a big disparity between stealth suits and nightkin, let alone people with standalone stealthboys. Sure nightkin "look" comparatively weaker than their normal super mutant counterparts, but Nightkin are the strongest stealth-abled people on the server, I don't think you realize that.
  4. If what y'all is saying is true, then I deeply apologize to @EtWaryRomana for thinking it was AI generated if it's not, that will be on SC to figure out. (still don't excuse the other issues with the /me's)
  5. Even if you ignore the fact it was written by an AI, some of the /me's don't make sense or contribute to the overall project, and he doesn't roll for a number of them, and then the outcomes are not included in the next /me. What is the point of the roll if you are just not going to acknowledge the outcome?
  6. I mean if this gets accepted, I will just AI generate all my research /me's from now on since this is far more simple and easy to do.
  7. Yeah I have a feeling this was generated by an AI. There are paragraphs of story-like detail to describe such mundane tasks. This has such oh-so-unnecessary detail if you legitimately typed this, which I highly doubt. Every noun has an adjective, a chair just can't be a chair, it has to be the righteous aged gray chiseled chair rocking against the creaky cracked blue floors. I also take issue with the fact a considerable number of screenshots aren't accompanied by a roll. You just copied the paragraph and pasted it without rolling. Additionally, you don't acknowledge a number of success/failures. You succeed in a roll and just move on without talking about what that success/failure meant. You roll to succeed in a search for something and never say what. Just looking at cherry-picked examples of Day 3 alone: This is a very complicated way of saying you found a good building to search (which is just your spawn room... If you are going to search an abandoned building, literally go anywhere but your own spawn.) I don't know why it's written like a resume, like you're trying to impress. Doesn't even make sense, you are digging through crates for resources to "enhance" your "efficiency" of... "this operation" which is presently just...digging through crates? So you are just searching for stuff to help you search better? Like for gloves or a flashlight? Not to mention you don't include what you found in the containers in the next action, you just rolled and ignored it. What did you find in these crates? You skipped it and moved onto the lockers (of which you did not roll for). …You placed items on the table, arranged it and picked up a cable. Only an AI would make such a task sound so momentous. Now this passage on it's own isn't bad. I sometimes make a mundane task sound like a battle, but that's after like, failing 15 rolls. I recall I spent a whole day trying to dig out a screwdriver from a barrel, 20+ failed rolls in a row, and I got increasingly angry and just gave up and that was the whole day. Legit. However, you did this with every task you were doing. With the AI generated content you were using, it would make tying your own shoe a 3 paragraph adventure. Lastly, Just say "I organized the haul from the abandoned building to make it easier to search later". I managed to say the same thing and it's much easier to understand. Even the project description is AI generated, "went on a comprehensive initiative to enhance the capabilities" what the fuck does this even mean? He's researching zipties, not discovering a new element. Same with "but also fostered a sense of unity and preparedness among the ranks in throughout Utah." It's so laughably bad. Overall, it's a lot of vague adjective-ridden jargon that manages to say so little in the paragraphs of text.
  8. VATs is very much weapon dependent. VATs with an minigun or auto weapon? Damn near useless. VATS with a 1 shot weapon (antimat or shotgun)? Lethal. It's a janky system where at times, it would miss shots of a guy barely moving when I could just mag dump him without missing.
  9. The screenshot looks like combat baiting, guarding just outside someone's spawn with a weapon up to instigate combat (knowing full well they can't take you on because you have better equipment/ numbers). However, I can't recall if combat baiting is a rule on this server or not. This would be the same if 5 NCR in PA sat with weapons up watching PF spawn with 1 PF on. Neither situation sits well with me...
  10. Mutants are balanced because while they are strong, they get inflicted with the debuff mutant brain while on their mutant char, decreasing their IQ.
  11. I thought we were trying to move away from constant PVP, like increasing raid timers and so on, I feel like this is a step in the wrong direction.
  12. 1.) What does Scott and Marski have to do with this? You have both of their names linked? 2.) The video is private 3.) I understand the frustration of having petty reports done against one but like, this is no more than a warning/slap on the wrist for first time offenders if staff were available, so a report this unsubstantial really won't amount to much. If it happened several times during the session (again, I can't see the video) it would be more appropriate. 4.) you forgot to grab Sep 23, 2023Scott locked and pinned this topic Please include this in your post next time.
  13. I don't like to meat ride, Frankie178.

    1. BearGrills11

      BearGrills11

      the meat riding is crazy

    2. Garrus

      Garrus

      @BearGrills11Damn bro your reply makes no sense. Also, long time no see!

    3. BearGrills11

      BearGrills11

      yo sup fam, also u still edited it!! @Garrus

  14. (resubmitted now that it might be a possibility) Question 1: What is your Discord ID?: Garrus#5919 Question 2: Can you provide a link to your Steam profile or provide your Steam ID? Example: STEAM_0:0:20009090 Question 3: What type of custom order content are you requesting? Custom System + Weapon Question 4: Please provide specific details about your order. Robobrain Ripped straight from the wiki on the item: Functioning similarly to Securitrons (not a pill), with some flexibility, possibly have upgrade kits and/or whitelists (to separate robobrains from the stronger distinct "Masterbrains" and NCOs equivalants) with a few basic models difference between each. Question 5: Which faction is this order associated with? Vault-Tec, possibly other factions depending... Question 6: Could you please share a screenshot or media of the system? Question 7: Provide a link to the resource. Vault-Tec skin can be found in-game files of Fallout 3 I know the animations do not work in the previous links I sent so it will have to be taken from the game Question 8: Do you accept our Terms of Service? Yes Question 9: Do you understand that the prices mentioned above are final and non-negotiable? Yes
  15. +1 This is his first ban ever as far as I am aware (extending this range to CGC as well), and there are players on divide who have been unbanned for doing questionably worse (without naming names) and players who have been unbanned who did very similar offenses of snapping and going postal. Not justifying what he did, but if players who did similar or worse can get unbanned (who also have a history of bans/appeals, especially on CGC) then surely someone who has an otherwise clean record can get unbanned after how many months later?
  16. In-Game name: Malachi Date & Time of bug/error: Oct. 10 - Present Description of bug: When equipping the "Men's Vault Dweller Outfit" (and presumably "Women's Vault Dweller Outfit" but unconfirmed), the playermodel breaks and T-pose, with the actual clothing invisible, leaving only exposed upper torso and legs. How do you perform/trigger this bug: Wear Men (and presumably Women) Vault Dweller Outfits Error console stack: N/A Supporting screenshots/videos:
  17. Garrus

    Gus Ban Appeal

    I don't know if this appeal is serious or not, but several members of the community have left over harassment such as this by dev and staff team, and apps like this are not helping the case of the, "our community takes it seriously". Several members of my own faction, VT, have legitimately left because of harassment/lack of it being taken seriously, if you see VT not being active as it used to be, that's one of the big reasons why. His harassment was the final straw for 2 staff members who decided to leave because it was not being addressed adequately. I like Gus, but come on, how hard is it to not post content that has sexual stuff to a minor. You know, the kind of stuff that Marski entraps and witch hunts people for that is normally applauded by the community?
  18. As Scott said, some evidence of how Ghouler harassed/targeted would aid your case, like screenshots of what he said in the discord and the context surrounding that (I say context as in don't just show what he said, screenshot the entire chat so we have the full picture). As for the GhoulsEye situation, it would additionally help if you provided information on that situation as to what prompted him to just threaten to mute you. Did he do it out of the blue when you were bringing up your concerns regarding Ghouler? Did you say heated words and/or he perceived you as "annoying" him? How did he treat you harshly and what did he say/do to make you feel like you were being spoken down to? Please flesh this report out more so it can be properly assessed.
  19. I understand the argument between "BOS and Enclave are balanced for each other solely" but if each core is REQUIRED to fight each other, then you have to balance them all against each other, otherwise how is it fair for the other cores? If it's a guaranteed 1v1v1v1, NCR and Legion should be balanced with Enclave in mind since they will be fighting them indefinitely. In my personal experience, I have seen almost no enclave in science uniforms nor have I seen enlisted, only PA (then again, could be timezone diff and all that so take this with a grain of salt). Additionally, I have seen plasma gats in action when fighting the PLA, that shit snipes across render (at least, last time I fought it it was that way).
  20. Garrus

    VT Research Boost

    That's not the reason, but something being POTENTIALLY abusable and something that has been previously abused is a big difference. Think Tank had super strong equipment but carefully moderate it, and VT doesn't "do whatever they want" with the GECK. It's carefully monitored with log and all. I think we have only used 1 GECK this entire wipe, and the project was denied so technically it's 0. If the POTENTIAL for abuse was a worry, they'd nerf the defib price and stock rate because it could POTENTIALLY get abused by FOA, but it hasn't, so they don't. You are planning for VT spamming out GECKs when that hasn't ever been a worry. And to remind you, we are talking about the realm of research, you know, something that majority of players don't give a shit about or want to do, we aren't talking about several high ends and adding more onto it, this buff and the GECK are very niche and will continue to be. In conclusion, a research buff + GECK shouldn't conflict in the same way a faction can add several high ends without it increasing the price of their other high ends into their vendor. Which the latter has far more utility and usability for the server generally than a research buff.
  21. Garrus

    VT Research Boost

    GECKs are not as good as you think, recall that research is incredibly niche to begin with. Plus that would still be issue regardless if the research boosts were researched, so. Furthermore, we do sell GECKs and were told to by dev team so radically altering it would hurt everyone. Additionally, almost no one wants to buy them because 99% of server don't research that warrants a GECK (i.e. fac storage/MRE don't need it), and a GECK is one of the few decent things we have, so a Research Boost + GECK is not as OP as you think Think Tank have 2x research boost but do we see them popping off? Case in point.
  22. What do you want to be changed? Research Boost of 1.5x for Vault-Tec Explanation of suggestion? I was told I needed to make a suggestion about it, so here we are. The Vault is advanced enough to start with a buff, comparatively speaking, to other factions who have a boost given VT has an impressive amount of products they have produced personally. On top of the fact the Vault would have the necessary Pre-War information to continue the survival of control/colonization Vaults, where intact information, resources and items can be found. (This list does not include weaponry that the Vault has built, experiments, etc which are numerous). West-Tek pales in comparison to the amount of products the Vault has built. How the Research Boosts would be incorporated would the storage facility that we commonly use in projects that, in RP, would be used to maintain the Vault and is how the Vault is able continue to manufacture it's own goods without requiring significant outside resources. How or why does this benefit the server? Bring Vault-Tec more in line and up-to-date with other factions who have some research boosts. Are there any workshop add-ons or content needed for this suggestion? N/A
×
×
  • Create New...